Here on the Internets, some or other bloggers have been criticized for talking about their troubles when others have it worse. This is an all-too-familiar routine on many blogs—the ol’ My Pain Beats Yours So Shut Up number. It goes a little something like this:
1. You shouldn’t be sad because your child has a scraped knee—my kid had to get stitches.
2. You can’t be upset about your kid’s stitches; my child is sick.
3. My child’s disease is worse, therefore you don’t deserve to bitch.
4. Shut up. My child is sick and I’m sick and also I’m writing this on a computer made out of cardboard because that’s how poor I am.
5. At least you’re alive. I’m writing this from my grave. Stop whining. Stop it. Booooo.
6. God, can you shut up, dead person? At least you’re not suffering. My life is a never ending festival of torment. Also I have hives.
(Please note: I’m not trying to make fun of anyone’s suffering. I cannot fathom how much suffering is out there, and I can’t begin to imagine the pain that other people withstand. Imagining such things would mean weeping and that would make the keyboard soggy, and the circuits and the whatnot would short out and cause some kind of Electric Dreams scenario, and people, I cannot afford to have my computer fall in love with me. )
And now for a story:
A while back, a friend of a friend was injured in a stupid, tragic accident that resulted in the loss of her leg. At the time she was also writing an advice column for teenagers. After I heard about her accident, I would at times wonder if she had ever responded to another complaint about the Tragedy of Bad Hair or The Heartbreak of Loserdom with, “I know how you feel. Because I LOST MY LEG. Which is just like losing your homework and getting a D. Except, you know, it’s a LEG.” Because I like to kill time with pointless activities, one day I went online and read a bunch of her columns. Week after week, she gave patient, compassionate advice to problems that the best of us would deem awfully silly. She never compared anyone’s pain to her own; she never even mentioned her pain. I know part of this was just her being a professional. But also, she clearly knew that pain is relative—just because you could hurt more doesn’t mean you don’t hurt.
That’s the thing about pain: perspective doesn’t necessarily ease it. Say I stub my toe: if you grab me and scream, “What if I had chopped that toe off with a cleaver! THINK OF IT!” I may be distracted by your odd behavior, but the pain in my pinky toe will not miraculously dissolve. When someone writes in their blog of some misfortune that’s befallen her, she is not necessarily writing her definition of the Worst Thing That Could Ever Happen to Anyone. Just because she could hurt more doesn’t mean she doesn’t hurt.
When I spoke to the New York Times, most of what I talked about was how the parenting blogs are, most of all, authentic. That’s all we’re after (I think)—some representation of authentic experience that we’re not getting elsewhere. We sure as hell aren’t getting it from the parenting magazines, which provide canned information about vaccinations and discipline and baking nutritious muffins that look like kitty cats, but will never help you feel less alone, less stupid, less ridiculous. This is the service we try to provide—we share our lopsided, slightly hysterical, often exaggerated but more or less authentic experiences. If one blogger writes about her traumatic doctor’s visit, then maybe at some point, some freaked-out new mother is going to read that and feel a little better—less stupid, less ridiculous—about her own breakdown at the pediatrician’s. Or maybe not. But what service are you providing when you tell her to shut up?
I now return you to your discussion of my son’s itchiness. He’s itchy! It’s the worst thing that could ever happen!




Nicely put.
Posted by: stephanie | February 22, 2005 at 12:48 PM
Okay so obviously this is happening elsewhere, I thought it was all me! Because I'm self absorbed!
I swear, everytime I write anything I get some e-mail with "JUST THINK! YOU COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE TSUNAMI!"
Posted by: Very Mom | February 22, 2005 at 02:31 PM
Geez, sure seems like people are eager to jump on the bash-Sidda bandwagon here. I didn't see the original comments at Dooce and I defintely have no desire to check them out now, so I can't comment on that. But honestly, I don't think Sidda's comments here are so horrible. I think she makes some sense, and it doesn't seem to me that she is bashing either Heather or Alice. I think Alice's post was really eloquent and I agree with her point. But I also see what Sidda is trying to say. And if we're being intructed to not bash the bloggers, how 'bout let's not bash the commentors, either? (Of course I realize that some commentors are definitely trolls, but what I'm saying here is--I don't think Sidda is one)
Posted by: Amy | February 22, 2005 at 03:49 PM
Indeed.
Posted by: Karen | February 22, 2005 at 05:25 PM
I have to agree with Amy. Sidda wasn't bashing anyone. I read both Finslippy and Dooce on a daily basis and am thoroughly entertained by it. But I can't help but think that, often times, comment section breeds a high-school level cliques. Everyone seems to jump to defend the blogger, even at the cost of not listening/seeing any other aspects and sides.
Posted by: Heidi | February 22, 2005 at 06:14 PM
I have to say, my initial reading of Sidda was that she was bashing Heather, and it pissed me off for a couple of reasons: 1) because Heather's had enough bashing, and 2) because Jesus not everything is about Heather.
Then I read it again today. It doesn't read as so bash-y today. Maybe it was the all caps--that always throws me. Sidda, I'm sorry if I pounced on you for something that wasn't there.
That said, I'm puzzled by the characterization that I jumped on Daddy Jones, that I was "slamming" him--um, really? First of all, as I've said ad infinitum, this is a blog phenomenon, not just about him. Secondly, was my post really that angry? Or maybe Sidda read into my post, just as I read into her comment, something that wasn't there.
Posted by: alice | February 22, 2005 at 06:50 PM
I read her post as bashing.
However, my comment was entirely altruistic. I was trying to be the one to prevent sidda "from being a whining teenager all over again". I found her comments annoying but I know she accepts that not everyone loves what she says and does. Oh screw it, maybe I'm just a bitch when condescended to.
Posted by: G. McFuzz | February 22, 2005 at 07:02 PM
Hi. In honor of our site's official Parent Appreciation Day, I just want to say I like your blog and really appreciate your insight and honesty and reality and compassion and perceptive-ness. You keep it real, and this post is a perfect example. Blogging, in and of itself is, in many ways, a testament to the fact many, many parents think through and care about their lives and children and families enough to write it all down - everyday. So, thanks and rock on.
Posted by: cooper | February 22, 2005 at 09:35 PM
the comments were much less meaningful and loaded way back when i read them yesterday. this is why i come back, alice. you never know when you'll get a good fight. and i mean that in the best possible way.
Posted by: katie | February 22, 2005 at 09:58 PM
Crap. I'm sorry.
I was completely over the top last night. It's true, I wasn't meaning to bash, but it's also true that a lot of what I said was superfluous. I was all over the place and ranting like a dork. All I wanted to say was, please let's stop even paying attention to people who are mean. And also, as a person who usually befriends people who have painted themselves into a corner because of their bad attitudes, I have found that usually their junk is because of their junk. Make sense? Maybe not. I was just trying to take away even more steam behind the meanness out there, and say also, New York Times! (as bittersweet as that turned out). NPR! World News Tonight! Adoring fans! Why care about Joe Blow from Timbuktu?
I'm sorry I scribbled all over your blog, Alice. You are so funny and all mom bloggers who put themselves out there make all of our attempts at motherhood feel much more normal and less lonely. Dooce included. I don't know what got into me, telling you two what to do, while telling you not to care when people tell you what to do.
And finally I'm sorry to my friend, who I brought along on my bandwagon. She knows what I mean.
Posted by: sidda | February 22, 2005 at 10:08 PM
Oh my god! Sidda! Let's hug!
I love it when everyone is friends again.
Posted by: alice | February 22, 2005 at 11:11 PM
Alice, I was with you until you said everything isn't about Heather. Are you trying to say that changing my legal name to "Dooce, Too!" and frequently shouting "OF FRANCE!!!!!" at pedestrians is overkill? That leaving 57 comments under each photo, every single day, weaving an intricate and virtually incomprehensible tangle of inside jokes along the way, smacks of some unhealthy obsession -- one that, I DARESAY, requires a restraining order?
I'm disappointed to hear that a certain unreasonable Utah judge isn't the only one with this perspective.
You are listed as "Heather 4" in my bookmarks, right below "Heather 2" (Google) and "Heather 3" (Amazon). If you insist on maintaining this "it's not all about Heather" farce in any way, you may well plummet to Heather 8. OR EVEN HEATHER 9.
Heather 1: Call me.
Posted by: Dooce, Too! | February 23, 2005 at 12:26 AM
Who's this Dooce person?
Ha. Gotcha.
Posted by: LOD | February 23, 2005 at 01:08 AM
All I can say is, who needs reality TV and Desperate Housewives when you can get entertainment like this? The only problem is finding time for the rest of my life in between following the blog wars.
I love all of you, really I do. You are my heroes!!
Posted by: danigirl | February 23, 2005 at 10:17 AM
Wow, classy sidda. I mean that for real.
Good on you.
Posted by: G. McFuzz | February 23, 2005 at 10:20 AM
But all this time, I've been waiting for YOU to tell me how to make nutritious kitty cat muffins! And, so far, you haven't. And that pains me. It pains me so much that I bet ten dollars that my pain beats your pain. ;)
Posted by: Martha | February 23, 2005 at 10:56 AM
I've gotten some bitchy e-mails about stuff I've written on my site and it's the hardest thing in the world to reply nicely, but every time I do it's worth it because it starts a dialogue rather than a flame war. You treat the criticizer with respect, and then the criticizer melts under the heat of your love.
So, Bravo! Everybody! For being grownups and listening to each other.
Posted by: Mrs. Kennedy | February 23, 2005 at 01:28 PM
Sorry, looking back on my comment it seems pretty smug. Like, "Congratulations, everyone, for acting mature, like me!" When I meant for it to be more like, "It's difficult to take criticism, especially from strangers, but not all strangers are asshats, and sometimes taking the effort to talk to them puts you both in a better place."
Of course, some people are just asshats.
Posted by: Mrs. Kennedy | February 23, 2005 at 02:58 PM
Yes indeedily-doodily, well said indeed. One-upmanship always reminds me of the time I was in my therapist's office, horribly depressed about the possibility of divorce (which was very strong) and single-motherhood (very intimidating). She asked if she could tell me something about herself, which I okayed. And then she told me how, in the midst of her divorce, she found out that the home she and her 4-yr-old lived in was infested with mold. She had to move out, and lost EVERY SINGLE THING she and kid owned. All pictures, clothing, toys, books, everything. She lived in her parents' basement while she tried to find a new place she could afford. The whole time, she was going through the divorce and being OkayMommyWhoIsNotSadAtAll and, oh yes, listening to the moans and gripes of patients.
That put a lot of stuff into perspective for me...
Posted by: JT | February 23, 2005 at 03:51 PM
Hi,
I just posted this link on dooce's comments, in haste. Like I'm the only dooceling to visit Finslippy, duh. Seeing these comments, I find I'm completely superfluous. Sorry. And thank you Alice Brady ;-) for the brilliant post.
- Jess
Posted by: Jess | February 23, 2005 at 04:04 PM
That's okay, Jess--I always enjoy seeing my hits go up by 150%.
Posted by: alice | February 23, 2005 at 04:08 PM
I found the link to this on Dooce, and I was totally amazed by your words. I have always wondered about this phenomenon. I remember complaining about my hair one time, and then thinking of the fact that my sister has no hair because she has alopecia, and I told myself not to complain about a bad hair day. I think it is good sometimes to compare yourself to others in order to put things in perspective, but I think it is completely unnecessary to tell someone else that they shouldn't complain because it could be worse. It is just rude, and we can never know exactly what someone else's pain feels like.
Posted by: Katie-be-bored-at-work | February 23, 2005 at 04:24 PM
Linked on dooce.com AND mimismartypants? Warn your server!
Loved the post, and loved even more the follow-up discussion. It's wonderful to see civility in disagreement; humility is admitting mistakes; and ultimately, two smart people who can find common ground.
I'll be back ... this was fun.
Posted by: Nils | February 23, 2005 at 06:07 PM
You rock, Alice. Seems pointless to mention that NOW, some 70-odd comments later (have I mentioned that this job thing is seriously cutting into my blog time, both writing and reading??), but I don't like to miss an opportunity for a little appropriate hero-worship.
Also that new pic of Henry is fabulous.
And you're pretty. ;)
Posted by: Mir | February 23, 2005 at 08:19 PM
Well done, everyone. I heartily concur. Our blog was the site of some bashing of late when our dog attacked my husband and sent him to hospital to get 40 stitches. We put her down immediately, of course - it was a no brainer situation. I'm eight months pregnant and of course it was a blessing that it happened before the baby arrived, but it was still a huge shock. I wrote up the story of the attack and posted it for our family and friends. The English Setter and doggie online communities got hold of the story and all hell broke loose. Most of what we got in the comments were sympathetic and awesome support, though there were a few "it's a DOG, people" assholes and some trackback people who linked to the story on their blogs and proceeded to tear us apart and tell the world their two cents about how stupid we are. In the personal emails there were more, and lots of people who told us that we had nothing to complain about and that we'd brought it on ourselves, and to shut up because they'd been through something more devastating and so on. It's positively BOGGLING how insensitive people can be on the internet - walking into a community and shitting on the carpet and unrepentantly defending their right to do so. Goes to show how few people bring their manners with them when they go out in public, online or in real life.
In our house we have an old-timey hand-lettered sign. It reads: BE NICE OR LEAVE. Should be an overarching western-society rule.
Posted by: Ashley | February 23, 2005 at 09:20 PM
I just read through all these comments and am so fascinated by all the anger that seems to run through some blogger comments, but congratulations for being able to apologize for saying hurtful things. I have really only seen this happen on Dooce and a few others, so I don't really know all that much about trolls, and I'm sorry for bringing up Dooce again. However, I think that what actually sparked all of this is the fact that the words that Heather used in her post are very dramatic. Surely no one REALLY thinks that people aren't entitled to hurt when their children are hurting, but I just think that it is all the DRAMA that makes people think "get over it". Of course, on the flipside, Dooce wouldn't be nearly as funny, nor have nearly as many readers if she didn't use drama, covered in sarcasm, to get her point across. I hope this isn't coming off sounding judgemental, and believe me, I believe in using drama and humor and sarcasm to make things bearable. I just think sometimes people mistake all of this for taking everything so seriously. Daddy Jones was obviously not in a place where he could see using drama and sarcasm as a way to deal with something that hurts, and hopefully people can just be more sympathetic when someone like him points out the difference in pain. BTW, I am knew to your blog, and have really enjoyed it. Thanks!
Posted by: april | February 23, 2005 at 11:58 PM
Er, the quote about 20 posts ago: "Be kind for everyone is fighting a great battle" is by Philo (not Plato), the early Jewish scholar, philosopher, and mystic, sometimes referred to as the first theologian. 30 B.C. - 40 A.D. Clearly this has been the subject of debate for centuries, and that alone is worth thinking about.
Posted by: Redhead | February 24, 2005 at 10:13 AM
I wanted to add a story to one-up your story about somebody trying to trump other people's pain with their own: when my laptop computer was stolen in October of 2001, someone said to me, well, at least you weren't in the Twin Towers. Now that's what my husband & I say to each other whenever one of us complains about having a cold/too little sleep/car maintenance issue, etc. It might be annoying but hey, at least we weren't in the Twin Towers! [Oh, and did I mention that the person who pointed this out to me was a nun?]
Do I win the competition now, or what? ;)
Posted by: Beth | February 24, 2005 at 01:04 PM
Having just had my very own breakdown in the pediatrician's office this week I thought it was fate that I should discover your blog today and see this post.
Posted by: Wendy | February 24, 2005 at 01:54 PM
i aspire to be the sort of genius that you are. i don't tend to be liberal with the compliements and so know that this is genuine. you are wise, missus, and i likes the cut o yer jib.
Posted by: honestyrain | February 24, 2005 at 02:37 PM
I love this post and I am linking to it... RIGHT NOW!
Thank you for saying this so well.
Posted by: MoMMY | February 24, 2005 at 03:04 PM
Well said. It's like some people think that just because their pain is worse, you don't have the right to feel any amount of pain whatsoever. Bah to that!
Posted by: Spring | February 24, 2005 at 05:37 PM
very nice...
Posted by: JR | February 24, 2005 at 09:02 PM
i stopped reading the other comments a long time ago, but wanted to say a big, "Totally!" to your post today. even outside of the blog world people are so so guilty of "my pain is worse than your pain" and really you only have your own experiences through which to judge your own pain and can never ever really know how other people experience their own pain, joy, etc. All pain is relative. that's all i have to say about that. thanks.
Posted by: zbeth | February 25, 2005 at 10:55 AM
Awesome, classy, and could we have some more please?
And how's the Sith Lord today?
Posted by: carrie (the other one) | February 25, 2005 at 11:55 PM
Very wise words. Pain doesn't need to be treated like a competitive sport!
Posted by: Ann D | February 26, 2005 at 10:21 AM
My sympathies to Henry - wool pants drove me nuts when I was a kid, my Cub Scout uniform gave me a rash (to the point of dispensation from having to wear it), and once, after sunning on a new, deep-dyed orange hammock, I spent the rest of the weekend in a cold-water tub, trying to keep from going mad. From either wisdom or just getting older, none of these have repeated, and I can wear those good wool pants, too.
But these were very specific sensitivities for me - I'm pretty much allergy-free - and for those who have to face something more deep-seated, a slip-up or accident can be life-threatening, e.g., anaphylactic shock. The list of life's dangers becomes just that much longer for them.
There has to be a categorical distinction, however, between these more or less natural threats - pains that are so acute when we are young and they are new, but which age to annoyances, all the way up to catastrophes of the earth, weather, plague, accident - and the truly unnatural ones - social violence, genocide, torture. The latter were willed by someone not unlike you, and I think that deposits a special bitterness to surviving the injury. Historically, the number of people murdered by individual psychopaths is miniscule compared to the mass slaughter of faiths and ideologies. Survivors of those slaughters are not unsympathetic to others' pain, but their own is, I think, set apart.
Posted by: grishaxxx | February 26, 2005 at 10:21 PM
O, yeah, Ogged sent me - great post, great thread!!!
Posted by: grishaxxx | February 26, 2005 at 10:23 PM
I was linked by Strong Coffee - you are my new favorite! I'm going to send this entry to all my blogging buddies. May I hot link your blog on mine?
Posted by: MOT | March 01, 2005 at 05:30 PM
I agree. I think that at the end of everyone's life, we all have a "#1 worst thing that ever happened to me" to look back on. It doesn't make sense to subjectively rank hurts, especially since what we post on the Internet is *always* out of context from our actual selves, and often elaborated to make it interesting. Maybe it's our human need to have other people know how we feel (and vice versa) that causes this kind of comparison-drawing.
Posted by: Megan | March 01, 2005 at 08:35 PM
Particularly when it comes to blogging, the point is to share your perspective, not project how much worse it is to have to die in the tsunami or in the collapse of the Twin Towers. The beauty of blogging is that you can get anecdotes and opinions across a wide spectrum, from a mysteriously itchy baby to a baby facing major surgery. I don't get trolls either. If they want to read about people who have it worse, well, go ahead. Probably someone's blogging about it.
I'm not a mommy, but I love dipping into the mommyblogs from time to time. I appreciate the honesty and the detail y'all share about the day to day challenges of parenting.
Posted by: bree | March 03, 2005 at 11:51 AM
I'm so glad you said what you said. I've always maintained that just because I've suffered great pain (death of two children), doesn't mean that your pain is any less. Pain is pain. There is no comparison in pain, there is only compassion and understanding and absolutely no one-upsmanship. It bothers me when people apologize to me because they are in pain--heck, their pain is VALID. I have never played the "dead kids" card.
Posted by: Bev | March 07, 2005 at 07:23 PM
vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies
vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies
videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies videos-movies
vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies vides-movies
Posted by: account | July 14, 2006 at 05:43 AM